Spots

Lindsay Clancy lawyer raises explosive doubt over who killed her children

Former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani breaks down Kevin Reddington’s new reasonable-doubt argument — a potential shift from Clancy’s mental illness defense.

PLYMOUTH, Mass. — Lindsay Clancy’s defense lawyer made

PLYMOUTH, Mass. — Lindsay Clancy’s defense lawyer made a surprise shift in strategy Tuesday, according to legal analysts — shifting gears from his argument at trial that she was not criminally responsible because she suffered from postpartum psychosis.

"Where’s the evidence that she did this?" Clancy's

"Where’s the evidence that she did this?" Clancy's defense attorney, Kevin Reddington, asked Judge William Sullivan in court Tuesday. "Where is the evidence she did this?" Reddington made the argument while asking Sullivan to enter a not-guilty finding after the jury deadlocked.

Lindsay Clancy looks at jurors as Judge Sullivan

Lindsay Clancy looks at jurors as Judge Sullivan asks them to start deliberations for a sixth day. The Lindsay Clancy jury resumes deliberations for a sixth day on Thursday, Sept. 3, 2026. (Greg Derr/The Patriot Ledger)

"I submit to the court there is no

"I submit to the court there is no evidence she made any statements, as far as the actual killing of the children, which forms the basis of the indictments," Reddington said.

Plymouth County prosecutors countered, calling his assertion "a

Plymouth County prosecutors countered, calling his assertion "a laughable argument." But it marked a striking change in the way he's argued the case in the past. WATCH: Kevin Reddington spends 8 minutes, 27 seconds attacking the allegation that Lindsay Clancy killed her kids

He pointed to what he described as gaps

He pointed to what he described as gaps in the physical evidence, including the blood, DNA, timing and circumstances surrounding Clancy’s suicide attempt, which left her paralyzed.

"For the first time we saw Kevin Reddington

"For the first time we saw Kevin Reddington say that there’s reasonable doubt as to whether Lindsay Clancy actually killed her children," said former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani, who has been closely following the case. "He's never said that in the courtroom, outside the courtroom — and in fact at the beginning of the first trial, he offered to stipulate to Lindsay killing her three children."

Callan, left, Dawson and Cora Clancy. The three

Callan, left, Dawson and Cora Clancy. The three children were killed at their Duxbury, Massachusetts, home in January 2023. (Lindsay Marie Clancy/Facebook)

Sullivan declared a mistrial on Sept. 4 after

Sullivan declared a mistrial on Sept. 4 after jurors could not agree on a verdict following roughly a week of deliberations. Since then, several jurors have spoken out publicly, describing an 11-1 deadlock with only one man voting to find her guilty of murder.

News

Lindsay Clancy lawyer raises explosive doubt over who killed her children

Former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani breaks down Kevin Reddington’s new reasonable-doubt argument — a potential shift from Clancy’s mental illness defense.

@spots #us
Source: Fox News
See more like this