[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$f3k6y2jv6rbljc":3},{"_id":4,"slug":5,"title":6,"subtitle":7,"kind":8,"cards":9,"tags":17,"categories":18,"source":19,"lang":22,"author":23,"audioState":26,"stats":27,"publishedAt":30,"renderer":31},"6aba5c40ca21c797c7e98665","--v2ex-b89596d8","我实在是无法理解认为重置周期时间会亏这种想法 - V2EX","之前在某个群里我也表达了相同观点，刚才看 v2ex.com\u002Ft\u002F1244965 一帖觉得实在是忍不住想吐槽。 假设你开了一个月的 plus\u002Fpro ，如果月内无论什么时候重置会有两种情况： 如果本来原始周期就能完成覆盖工作使用，那重置与否都无影响。","news",[10,12],{"headline":6,"body":7,"imageUrl":11,"sourceImageUrl":11},"https:\u002F\u002Fi.imgur.com\u002FagAJ0Rd.png",{"headline":13,"body":14,"imageUrl":15,"images":16},"如果可能单个周期最后还是会缺一点，那重置会给你提供提前重启让你接续工作。无非就是： a. 正好接到你恰好用完，最赚的一种情况 b.","如果可能单个周期最后还是会缺一点，那重置会给你提供提前重启让你接续工作。无非就是： a. 正好接到你恰好用完，最赚的一种情况 b. 没用完但是重置了，没有那么赚但是提前重启让你避开过了当前周期本应被暂停的可能。 c. 用完了之后才给了重置，工作确实终止了，但是只要比原本的重置来得早都是等于减少了暂停时间。 换个比喻：去餐馆吃饭，点了个套餐，不管是什么时候，老板给你上一份新的套餐把旧的收拾了，这到底亏在哪里了。","\u002Fapi\u002Fmedia\u002Fposts\u002F--v2ex-b89596d8\u002F1.webp",{"local":15},[],[],{"name":20,"url":21},"V2EX Hot","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.v2ex.com\u002Ft\u002F1245140#reply151","zh-cn",{"handle":24,"displayName":25},"spots","Spots",null,{"views":28,"likes":29,"saves":29,"shares":29,"completions":29,"opens":29,"skips":29,"depthSum":29},5,0,"2026-09-28T12:23:28.411Z","local"]